como se puede detectar el cancer de mama

you have to think think again. read more thinkmore and then come up with a solution for yourself and for our love ones regarding healtheffects of electromagnetic fields i will start with a short introduction and then i willtalk a little bit about the functional impairment or disability that is called electrohypersensitivity; then i will talk more about scientific results regarding this disability and then i willmove shortly into health effects of electromagnetic fields today there are much more than 25.000publications that are relevant to this subject ; it is just impossible to cover all the aspectsi will just hangout a few pieces for you to ponder upon and also i will show you thefront page of scientific publications; so you do not think that i am a kind of makingthe stories up, they are real , they are all

published in peer-review base scientific journalsand just this very year we have ourselves being grounded to come back to publishingin a nature scientific reports so we have done a kind of a journey from the top to thebottom and back to the top again so now these issues are in the very finest of scientificsoluce and then i will start with a general background ; gentlemen do not let hard workkill your wife , let electricity do it you can read this saying , of course ,in twoways but one way definitely we can rule out no one wantsto hurt anyone, all of these electric or computerized orelectronic or digital gadgets are here for us to have a better and easierlife and much more fun life but when electricity

on a grand scale wasintroduced into the human society and that is about one hundred and twentyyears ago and in the beginning there were a very few, few, few people who had electricityof course but one more so and maybe we will have to admit that we have adducedforces , powers that we cannot control really or if we shouldcontrol that we need to invent tomorrow's green human friendly technologyand already at the end of 1900 century there were persons that started to claim adversehealth effects and when you read about these of any reportsyou realize that they were probably electrohipersensitivity they were reporting about electrohypersensitivityand the most famous person historically is

nicola tesla who invented so many differentelectronic gadgets and he was as far as one can understand electrohypersensitivity .todaythe most famous electrohypersensitivity person is of course gro harlem brundtlandthe former head of who and former prime minister of norway a very ,very ,very intelligent andclever person and she is still electrohypersensitivity when it comes to more general issues of healtheffects one has to mention nancy wertheimer and ed leeper who in denverinvestigated the association between power lines and childhood leukemia and they foundsuch association and the very famous science paper in 1979 was the start of thatparticular research area and that led out in2001 that the world health organization cancer

classified power frequent magnetic fieldswhich is a long word for household electricity and it is association to childhoodleukemia . so you already in 2001 has a very importantlegal step in that way. then we will move and we could talk a lot about history , imean , there are so many things in history that there are important but timeis short here but now we will move into a functional impairmentelectrohypersensibility you know functional impairmentsis the reason for that was called disabilities and then for handicaps nowadays we are notallow to say handicaps and we are not allow to say disabilities any longerand just upon the term of functional impairment

you have to remember that every human beingmany, many, many times during his life will be functional impaired specially children.and for instance, myself , coming here i immediately when i arrived to the airport i become functionallyimpaired because i can not speak spanish and that is the united nations, description ofthe term functional impairment that's the definition and you will be functionalimpaired if you go to sweden because you cannot speak swedish so you havethat typical definition and in sweden you know swedes as a saying we are a verysort of squared and we do everything very rightly and precisely we always listen towhat people about us tell us and the united nations has told us how we should look uponelectrohypersensitivity and other functional

impairmentsand therefore we do as they say , in sweden electro hypersensitivity and then it is afunctional impairment it is not a disease , very important to realize this, the personsare not patients, they do not have a diagnosis , we do not treat them a part from their symptomsif they have a headache ,of course , they could go to doctor a headache pill , an aspirinand ,of course, if they have a severe they can get sick leave that will be pay by thestate nothing special with that but the culpritis still the environment , it is the environment that should be treated if we see like thatand as you see this is from the year 2000 and at the samehere the norway council of ministers was classified

the symptoms of electrohypersensitivityas an occupational related symptom based diagnoses , the reason for that was at that time mostof the ideas and studies came from occupational work ,today ,of course, you will haveelectrohypersensibility regardless of where you are, in your home ,in the playground , inthe school ,at work, at the car park wherever , so today they will need to changethis definition a little bit and therefore they also have a icd -10 code so you can findthat together , today the most recent code now w90 i will double checked that out , andin sweden electrohypersensitive people have their own handicapped organization, the swedishassociation for the electrohypersensitive , they are included in the swedish disabilityfederation , they get the government subsidies

it's in the order 1.7 million swedish crownsthat will equal approximately 200,000 €, so they get back to drive forwardthe needs of people for with the electrohypersensitive and in sweden as everywhereactually is the same in spain , france, england wherever you go all themember countries of the un must hear in the same way and the responsibility forfunctional impairments belong to the municipalities and they follow something that previouslywas called the un 22 standard rules and so on but since 2007 its upgradedinto the un, sorry, un convention on human rights for persons with functional impairmentsand as you know from a legal point of view that'sthe highest legal level we have on this planet

there is nothing about up the convention fromthe un that's the top level really and in sweden we follow that and that means it'svery simple actually, you know, you can summarizeall of these texts and there are a lot of texts i can tell you fromthe un but you can summarize into one sentence people with the functional impairment electrohypersensitivityare entitled to have an equal life in a society based on equality. and that goes for everyoneand ,of course, if you ask yourself here what, forinstance people high up in the society what their monthly income is compared to yourincome you realize that you do not live in an equal society ,but we should aim for itand especially when comes to

functional impairments and one of the mostimportant principle is the one about completely accessibility , and like in swedeni see the same here we have a lot of needing buses, face sidewalks ,wheelchair ramps, automaticsliding doors, etc. to make all the public areas fullyaccessible for people with various impairments and the same hopefully will be done also forelectrohypersnsibility more, and more and more in sweden we follow then the un textsand they only talk about the environment and thatmeans that no human being is in itself impaired, there are instead shortcomingsin the environment that cause the impairment. thus , it is the environment that should betreated through accessibility measures

and that is also summarize in a swedish actionplan for persons with impairments and that is from 1999 /2000 and here it isthe swedish title of it and it has a very interested subtitle it sayshere from patient to citizen before this year people with functional impairmentwere viewed like patients but that it is illegal, you can not do that any longer , not in sweden,not in spain anywhere , for instance, when i come from you lovely airport and suddenlyi can not speak spanish , i am not a patient , i do not have an illness . i am just a functionalimpaired swedish person . a citizen of sweden . so just remember that , that make the wholeissue very simple and that means that , for instance, to forcea person to quit one’s employment or to

move from one’s home is a serious legalviolation. and in sweden the authorities responsible for discrimination have said to people withelectrohypersensitivity that if they ever, ever, ever feel discriminating any way theyshould file a legal complain, immediately, regardless of what situation or where it isin society by who immediately file a legal complain and the same goes , of course, forchildren your are not allowed to discriminate themfrom their educational rights or the rights to play, live and function. never!so as you see electrohypersensitivity and all other functional impairments shall justenjoy their human rights nothing more nothing less. very simple ,but maybe someone ,notyou , does not agree , then you can think

like this , just think ,for a moment, if yourloves ones have electrohypersensitivity what would you then want from your country andas i said you no ask what you can do for your country ask instead what your country cando for you , but you see there is a mistaken that … shall do for you it is not a matterof can it shall they have to and therefore the un changed their standard rules to conventionafter that you can file a complaint against your own country and send it to the un andsay hey i am functional impaired i live in spain and i am discriminated you have to actupon on this and the interesting thing with conventions from un is that they could sendfines , economic fines to countries and now we are talking about hundreds of millionsof sweden crowns . it’s a huge amount of

money and no country wants to have fined likethat . so you are really, all of you in a very good situation from a legal point ofview and you need just step up and make yourself heard and tell your government from the municipalityor whatever authority what you need and they must give it to youso just be strong. and the interesting thing , you know, i need sometimes civil servants, for instance, you know from the municipalities that go, well this is difficult i do not knowif i could do this , bla, bla, they would not say that if they were themselves affectedor their husbands or wives or children or dogs or goldfishes then they will claim forsupport . it is easy to say no to someone when you are healthy and not impaired. youdo not do it if you know what the person is

talking about. but just be tough , you knowthen we will talk quickly a little bit about results from science and very early i goneinto this area already at end of the 1970s and the beginningof 80s because in sweden started to come forward especially women butalso men that claimed health effects specially from the skin when they started to use thesenew personal computers that were introduced in offices and in different placesand you know they were huge cathode tubes behind these computer screens and then westarted to take skin biopsies to look in the microscopehad something happened and i will just quickly to show some samples that they are all published.here ,for instance, you see a

picture from a person with electrohypersensitivityit is taken in the microscope it is a small piece of the skinand what you see here is uppermost part of the skin which is called the epidermisand this is the part that goes a little bit deeper down called the dermis and these whitecells here they belong to the immune system and you have to remember now we arein the nineteen hundred eighties i was coming from the central nervous system i knewa little bit about the brain and spinal cord and things like that buthuman skin not very much and therefore i was an amateur, we have taken pictures likethese we have them on the table and they were not marked or anything andinto this room came a clinical dermatology

an expert on human skin and skin diseaseslooking at the pictures ,immediately , said , ah, you are looking at some patientswith a very strong in human reaction , how could you say that , well ,you know ,normally you would find single such cells in the human skin , this is a massive activationof the human system ,because these cells are of the outermost portion of thehuman system they are looking out to always react to changes in the environment and rememberi am an amateur really so i did not know that this a classical imageof the radiation damage like from x-rays and strong ultravioletlight or radioactivity but they were not victims of that they had just sat in front ofthe new modern computer screens and still

got the very same reactions, andthen we made a provocation and exposure experiment and you see all the cellsafter the exposure they have gone away and again being an amateur i told mycollaborators no ,no ,no, no, no ,no they cannot disappear , cells do notdisappear you know you must have done something wrong so i sent them back tothe laboratory to redone all these steps to produce a new set of images the resultwas the same , had i not been such an amateur i would have know that in springtimein sweden and you know right now in sweden it does not look like this itis very dark and it is getting much darker for a long ,long time but in the spring ,again,as it is getting lighter outdoors people

run out at lunch time and they stand that,oh god , sun, sun you know it is blink sun on the skyand then this happens , these cells we will react and then they will move into deeperorgans like lymph nodes and they will report thatthe person and it will be a fair skin swede he or she is again out in the sun and youknow the sun is extremely dangerous radiation source so the body reacts by sendingsignals back to the skin saying built pigment, built the pigment, built pigmentand we will get the suntan and that is actually nice in a way but it is a post inflammatoryhyperpigmentation to protect swedes against this sun and we see the same hereand already early in the eighties it formed

inmy head that people with electric hypersensitivity they may be victims ofradiation damage not from the sun not from radioactivity not from x-rays but fromnon ionizing radiation from computer screens and later from mobile phones, e-readersand whatever , so that has been our working hypothesis .we also tested forfrom another cell type called mast cell , they have nothing to do with telecommast , it is a german name actually of these cells and they contain substances suchas histamine and heparin they are the key cells for clinical symptoms such as allergiesasthma and other sensitivities and to make a long story short these are again picturesfrom, in

this case ,normally healthy volunteers.these are from electrohypersensitive people and i do not think you need to bea scientist to realize that there is a strong increase in the number of thesewhite spots each being a mast cell and suddenly there is a lot more , i am sorry,it is a lot more, here is something wrong, it is a lot more, they are bigger ,they shinebrighter and they are more superficial in the skin and again thisis a text book image of what you would see from workers being exposedto for instance fukushima and chernobyl this is a classical radiation damage fromradioactivity but they have not been exposed to radioactivitythey are just

electrohypersensitive people in sweden andstill they have the same reaction patrons and in sweden i do notknow for spain ,of course, but in sweden has been the last years anddecades a dramatic increase in the number of asthmatic and allergicpersons and patients it is the biggest public health issue right now and if you look onthe whole population it is more than one third and for children up to the age offourteen more than half of them are a schematic, allergic and so on , so it is a big big thing going on and maybe you have the answerhere it is nothing peculiar when kids use their mobile phones and tablets andso on they will be exposed to a non ionizing

radiation and their skin will react in thisway and clinically they will develop over sensitivitiesand it is interesting because this cell type in itself with its histamine contentcan explain all of the symptoms that people report being electehypersensitivesome physicians saying that this is a non specificreaction , oh, it is not, it is a very specific reaction andits your reaction radiation damage and it can be explained by mast cells and histamineonly , you do not need more than that , so we have suggested that while we should domuch more research into what we call mast celllead or trace or track so we do hope that

people will come with this. we have alsoinvestigated that if you only see c and d here again you have theepidermis , up here the dermis each dot is a mast cell as you see and we have nowtaken normal healthy volunteers in this case dental and medical students and we putthem in front of ordinary household television sets and ordinary housecomputer screens we expose them and then we looked over time what happened withthe mast cells , they should also report any symptoms , if you remember if i go backwarddid they get any of the electrohypersensitive symptomsif so they should be reported ,no student reported any symptom at all , somesaid it was boring to sit with their backs

fourty centimeters away for eight hoursbut nothing else than that but still when you lookafter two hours the number of mast cells and this is from the same person before the startthe exposure after two hours the number of mast cells have increased quite a lot as ifthey would have been visiting chernobyl or fukushimabut they have not, they have been sitting ina laboratory in stockholm, sweden with their backs to household television setsand computers screens and their skin reacts in the same way , all of this is publishedso if you want to read more about the details i could send you publications , other scientistsaround the world like peter french and charles

hardy in australia they have also investigatedhow must cells in cell culture react to the mobile phone signals, the microwaveexposures in australia to make a long, long story short these mast cells here do not liketo be exposed they react as if they had been exposed to a nickel or pollensor something similar but they were only sort of talking in the mobile phoneand they do not like it they reacted the same way and they will react atthe non thermal level it is not the heat shock response which scientifically it isvery important because the guidelines that weuse for public exposure only taking into account thermal effects and thermaleffects they are short you know the spanish

protective guidelines they implyfor mobile telephony and similar and wireless gadgets you can only buy and use one mobilephone during your life and most at 6 minutes otherwise the legal aspects of the guidelinescollapsed because they only stretch six minutes once in your life,how really is that , i mean sometimes you know i am a neuroscientisti know a little bit about the brain, sometimes feel that my fellow men and women ,not you,but others seen to be a little stupid upon of this you know , how could you even imagineto mimic a public exposure with the fluid filled plasticdoll and it is exposed at most 6 minutes once these dolls life time i do not understandthat and therefore

i have to remember i would show quickly youlater on in groups that were urged for biologicallybased exposure guidelines which are still lacking , so from that pointof view you are completely naked but if you are a fluid filled plastic doll in a laboratorythen it is fine, this very morning i was contacted by abc- australianbroadcasting corporation, in australia and they want to make scienceprogram about these issues , you see the whole interest around the planet isvery ,very big and i am constantly invited, and interviewed and reported about it is avery important issue evidently i have a colleague in japan, a very nice man,and he has studied, he has done lot of

studies actually ,here he has allowed a topiceczemas you know eczemas of the skin just exposed them to mobile telephony andthen the eczemas went worse and he could even followthat in the blood samples because there are markers in blood, the worsteczemas the more of these markets in blood and the markets are calledsubstances sp and vip and i got very excited you know so i called him and saidhajime kimata you have to come stockholm we mustcontinue to do more sophisticated studies along these lines because it isobvious that ,at least , eczemas should not buy and use you mobile phones ,but hajimesaid ,

he is a very kind man , he said you know that, no sorry , i cannot go to sweden , my boss does not allow me, somethinglike that , i was so glad he did not, because we did not have any money wecould not pay an air flight ticket , we could not pay anything, so it was just a stupidway of me to be excited and i was glad that he said no actually,you know ,but in a good world we would have been able to say you come , you bring yourfamily and relatives and children and dogs and cats and whatever you just come becausewe need your expertise to go to the bottom of this and you know thesestudies they are very early they are from the eighties andnineties and since then most of these trials

have been stopped and there is not anydevelopment actually which i find also odd, of course, you know ,i am sorry this isan old image as you see this a big computer screen here now they are smaller butyou see this person here and he or she is sitting working in front of acomputer screen getting the skin problems, feeling a littlebit electrohypersensitivity ,maybe, and ,of course ,it could be a matter of electromagneticfields we have talked about allergies , they could be light sensitivities, they could bechemical factors in the air ,but here also very importantly they could be psychologicalfactors ,for instance, coupling maybe, it is nothing wrong with the computer, thereis no radiation, but it is

a bad boss that is pestering the person allthe time and stressing him or her or maybe there is a personality issue , maybe thisperson is scared you know and everything is new and she does not really know what todo , i could sort of agreed to the whole idea and that was used in sweden forquite a number of years to downplay people we electrohypersensitivity , peoplesaid that no they are just victims of the imagination , they are old , they have loweducation and they are women it is a postmenopausal issueand so on so on so and the most popular thing to use to explain thisit is actually this man fault that you have a mass media driven psychosis whenhe is doing films of me and others

show that to the general public then the generalpublic says, um, maybe i am little bit electrohipersensitivity you to know ,or something like that , butit is so easy to solve and again i am so surprised that they were allowed to go around to saythis because to solve it you just use rats ,you know, rats do not listento this guy they do not watch his movies ,they do not listen to radio or tv,they do not read newspapers and still rats are damaged in the very same way as personswith electrohypersesitivity . so there is not your fault ,it is not mass media drivenpsychosis , it is not post menopausal problems, it is not a matter of education or anythinglike that and we have done quite a number of studies using rats as experimentalanimals and we have the

same effect on skin theory and so on so onthat i could go on that. well i will then leave electrohypersensitivity and i will goto the greater issue the bigger issue of general health effects of electromagneticfields on ,not only human beings, but on all animals or bacteria orplants on everything that is alive here on this planet that because while we are talking,you know that you are expose and if we just look on the third generation mobile telephony, not the second and not 4g just 3g and you ask yourselveshow much more of that type of radiation are you affectedby today life than 10 years ago , what would you say, it is two-times as much, three -timesas much, ten times , oh,

that is a lot more , ten times more she said,it is ten times more radiation , actually once there was an old man whosaid no ,no ,no ,it is much more it is a 100 times ,but he was wrong and you are too, becausethe answer is a quintillion times more compared to the natural backgroundand a quintillion it is a one and eighteen ceros , so the exposure you are sitting inyou are now and the plants and the dogs and the bacteriaand so on, it is just biblical , it is hard to understand from a physiological point ofview ,it is astronomical , but someone has decided that such exposure increases it issafe and unfortunately as a scientist you cannot findthat ,you cannot find the documents that tells

you it is save ,quite the contrary and,therefore, i am a little bit stressed upon of this ,you know, i get a lot of calls fromconcerned parents with children in wifi base schools ,from personsthat are neurological disease victims , cancer victims , their relatives, from electrohypersensitivitypeople, reporters, journalists , politicians ,lawyersm etc. ,everyone is calling trying to understand to all these scientific papers pointing todamage and harm suddenly in the political process could be turning to know harm turningto safe , it is very enigmatic to say this , youknow and i will just quickly talk a little bitabout this and i will concentrate around the

precautionary principle which we are supposedto use in the european union and together with alawyer i even written a number of papers about this specially one that is very importantto read for those that are interested. you know, insweden mobile telephony and other wireless products have been a very sweet piece of candysweden is probably the second richest country in the world per capita, per person livingthere only in norway is richer and you know , weswim in money, we have so much , we do not even what to do with whole of it you know, it is the same in norway and that is based uponby the industry telecommunication so it has

been a very , very nice piece ofcandy definitely , but ,you know, i love candy by the way , you know , i love to buy candy,um, um, um, um i bought candy yesterday at the train station,so, but you know when you buy candy and you eat it and eat it, eat it , youwatch television or something , i mean, and then it is alittle bit too much, it is in a bit too sweet and that is the same here veryearliest scientists like myself felt that this piece of candy was a little bit toogood to be true. and we started to write commentaries and debate articles andwhen i show this a few weeks ago then there was a woman in the audience who said who isthat

but it is actually the young man but thisis from the biggest , the largest tabloid in sweden called aftonbladet it isfrom september 17, 1995 you see it is a long time ago you were not even born atthat time and i asked in swedish how dangerous aremobile phones and i asked a number of questions sorry, a number of questions here andthere are still unanswered oddly enough and now you knowit has gone quite a number of years it is twenty years since then and still we do notknow the answers to them and the editor of this tabloidhe felt that i was a kind boring typical swede, so he added this , this is not me and it isnot my car ,you know, and it says

down here that eighty, nineteen hundred eightiesyuppie (yuppy) is dead but did it die because of the money seized to come or wasit because of the dangerous radiation from the mobile phone and peoplelaugh and said, all that is that is stupid , you cannot die fromthat kind of radiation ; you know, i think this editor john freemansson he must be akind o prophet because later on scientists have shown that that isexactly what will happen when, for instance, rats are exposure to mobileradiation at levels that are safe for human , their life span is shorten, in level termsthey die earlier ,so when we laughed maybe we should not have laughed, maybe , it wasactually the truth . and 1983, i coined an

expression that many other scientists startedand have been using and i said that” this is the largest full-scale experimentever. what happens when we 24- hours around the clock whenever we are , allowourselves and our children to be used as guinea-pigs, whole body –irradiated for the rest of ourlives and i do not get an answer and i have repeated myself you know 92, 98, 2000 , bla,bla, bla, bla, 2005 , 2008, 2011, bla, bla, bla, , now weare at 2015 and i am still going on at the same questionand no one is answering , no i am kidding , people have answered the question but theyhave answered in another way than i thought if you think that we are allaboard a ship , we are travelling on a ship

and we suddenlyrealize that a lot of the crew has abandoned ship already ten fifteen years ago the manufacturersof wireless technology have written very clearly that they do not takeany formal responsibility for any kind of health claims , the same forthe operators , in sweden they would be called telecom telia, i do not know the name here, but operators running the systems the same: no form of liability orlegal responsibility and they have used you know probably thousands of lawyers to writeall the type documents and form licenses and agreements . what about the insurances companieslike lloyds in uk and reinsurance in switzerland and all other insurance companies in the worldincluding skandia in sweden which is so small

,you know, they do not take any formalresponsibility ,they do not assure or reassure for health effects ofelectromagnetic fields ,so they even expand they do not talk about mobile phone orelectromagnetic fields that are mans made , no responsibility. so they have also abandonedship, they have answered the question and in the united states and england so inthe english speaking part of the world there is a saying : follow themoney ,then you get the answer and ,of course, this is a business model , although thereare no laws saying that manufacturers , operators or insurance companiesmust take responsibility the only must here isgovernments and parliaments and you know here

industry and in the insurance companies andso on they have a very simple business model , ofcourse, they want to have the profit but they are glad to give the cost to the societyand that they have done , furthermore radiation protection authorities like in swedenthey have on their websites instructions and suggestions saying that well, maybeit is very safe , but to be really safe maybe you should have a short calls andyou should use hands-free , put the phone away from you , again they are protectingtheir back ,you know, their legal back , and the same goes with the world healthorganization which it is really supposed to take care of you it is one of the bigmothers and fathers but they have learned

the lesson from thevaccine scandal with mmr xxxx so they do not take any responsibility and the easiestway not to do it , it is to say: well ,you know ,the electromagnetic signals from thesegadgets given to this baby here they are cancer classifiedsince the last of the may 2011, so if you send your children to schools orhomes or playgrounds where they are exposure to microwavesfrom these kind of gadgets and if they get cancer tumor 30 years later on , it is yourproblem because even the world health organization said this is a potentiallycarcinogenic exposure ,so if you can run and say hey , hey, hey, hey we want to havea legal and economic compensation , we told

cannot you read, so youare naked as babies you know and you have to hope that future governments andparliaments will help you and we talk from a legal point of view it isinteresting to see in the united states they have big very big law firms ,you know,and they are going after various levels of society because they have cancervictims and previously they were aiming at the manufacturers and operators, they do not do any longer, they are aiming for the american state ,they are suingthe american state instead ,you know, because they realized the other sidethey have already said no. stop. so whenyou ask questions sometimes somebody else

will answer for you and for me it is veryenigmatic that we allow this fully whole body exposures still ,when so many have abandoned ship and left us saving on our own , some people are notswedish , you know swedish are very nice, and so on , you knowthis is from northern ireland and this story here and that is from march 8, 2003 and yousee this one, these gigantic mast constructions about 250 meters high, they announced fromthe municipality that they were going to erect such a mast close to school and theparents said no we do not want that and municipality said we do not bother about you,we will built it and they did build it and then the parents they got pissed, sothey went and bought a metal saw and just

to down the whole mast and the municipalitiesgot an anonymous letter which is very famous because it is said in english ifyou ever erectus mast again we will kill you , you know in the north of irelandthat means one or two things : the ulster union or ira ,so they didn't build it again.that is not the way we do it in sweden. we sit down and talk and discuss and so on and,you know , come a compromise or whatever and this is not the way it should be done,of course , but it is interesting to see that parents they will protect their children andsometimes at any cost. the most scary thing of it all is actuallythe genotoxic effect namely that these rays and this particularpaper here it is by henry lai and narendra

n.p. singhit is a very prestigious journal , international journal radiation biology in 1996, when theyshow that both single-stranded and double-stranded dna willbreak when expose in this case to the bluetooth signal 2.5 gigahertz,at levels you are supposed to be stand for and this is called genotoxicityand one has decided when it comes to food items or pharmaceutical drugs if they showsigns during development of genotoxicity companies are not allowed to further developmanufacture and sell this because it is a nightmare of horribleproportions if a genotoxic affect it is let loose in the population ,but hereit is alright and this has been replicated

and replicated and replicated over and overagain i will show you one such example ; this isfrom the reflex study which is a gigantic study and to make it short herethey used the so called comet assay and i was shortly explain it when youdamaged dna you can look at it using a special electrophoreticequipment and in a sham exposure when no damage is takingplace you will get a very nice round shape but if you damage it for instanceusing gamma irradiation you will get the comet tail of small fragments becausethe molecule of the dna has been fragmentizedand here you can see if you x-ray these cells

that were used 1600 chest x-raysand there are no patients that have received 1,600 chest x-rays of coursebut equivalent to that then you get this image which oddly enough it is the sameimage you will get that after 24 hours mobile phone exposure at sar levels specificabsorption rate of 1.3 w/kg which is below what it is supposedto be safe. and when this study was done do you think that the industry ,the telecomindustry went to bizarre length to stop to be publishedyeah and they managed for two years, but after two years it was published, so it isout in the public domain you know, and just by trying to stop it, it is in itselftelling , if it was wrong just

publish it , then replicate it and show itto be wrong the telecom industry realized that henry laiand narendra n.p. singh were right and all the other scientistshaving done similar studies they were alright , so i was the prime ministerof sweden , for instance ,i would say no ,no we cannot expose the population , includingdogs ,plants, bacteria , etc. to something that is so strong and genotoxic, never ,ever and one should also remember now we talkedabout 1.3 w/kg you see here that was the exposure for 24hours but other scientists have used very, very ,very ,very small exposure levels verylow and this is actually one hundred thousand

times below the levels you are supposed tobe stand and still people see effects of eating and drinking , calcium fluctuations, dna effects , eeg brain (electroencephalography brain ) effects, you have a blood brain barrierleakages and changes in cell cycle and cell proliferation and this picture is from 1998,so it is very old since then scientists have added i do not know how many papers , thereare thousands and thousands of them that have been published and it is a colossal publicationrate i just saw yesterday that from the day before that i had received five more publicationsand this morning it was just four more publications and for me reading so slowly english i cannotkeep up pace ,there are too many publications all the time, i said that few have listenedbut apart from the operators, the manufacturers

, the insurance companies and so on , hereis an example of people listening and it is the municipality of benevento ,outside ofnaples , in italy and they were really upset and said you should gather the best top scientistsin the world from all countries in the world, you should bring them here , we pay for everything, the municipality did this, you know, and conference was held entitled the precautionaryemf approach: rationale, legislation and implementation , so it was a typical conference thatyou should have actually , i did not know you at that time , it was very much aboutthe law and legal aspects and at this conference again you see me here , this is eileen oconnorand albert shadowitz and we are standing outside the conference fences and it was decided thatwe should write a resolution and such resolutions

have been written before but on the internetand in science internet is none existence ,we never use that and things that are onthe world wide web they do not exist they need to be published in a peer- review basedscientific journal and when we went there and we decided to write a new resolution isaid this time we must publish it and the 29 other scientists professors said ok fineno journal in the world would publish that, you know, so you, you do it , you do it , youwill fix that , you know, that it was super easy , there was no problem and it is publishedin very good scientific journal, it is from 2006 and i will not run through all the texthere , i will just point out that ,for instance, we said we need to put together all the publicationsof relevance ,in other compilations , people

are mostly trying to find papers that didnot show anything , it is like showing pictures of stockholm, stockholm by claiming it isbarcelona ,yeah ,you can not do that , but here people tried to do it in other resolutionsand compilations, but i said we need to take pictures from barcelona if we are going totalk about barcelona and ,in this case ,we need to take the relevance scientific papersand we need to compile them, also we said that arguments that weak electromagnetic fieldscannot affect biological systems do not represent the current spectrum of scientific opinion, and also we said that the precautionary principle needs to be implemented , we mustinform the population of potential risks , do you remember what i said : do not trust meyou , have to go to all the published information

and make up your own mind i do not want youto change your life and say well olle johansson from sweden came here and said we should dothis, no , you have to take your own responsibility, but during that process you should listento information , but be aware most of the information like on the internet is desinformation, you need to be a little bit smart when you read and ask yourself who is actually publishedwhat and for what reason , we should limit cell phones and cordless phone use by youngchildren and teenagers and we would ban telecom companies from marketing to them ,fifteenminutes left ,fifteen ,thank you that is perfect. the bioiniative report 2007 : you know whenyou ask for something ,like in sweden people would say : oh let us have a party and noone steps forward and says i will help you

, but the person who said it must do it andit is the same here , i thought that a lot of people would step forward and help us , butthey did not , so we had to sit down and we worked for nine months and we did not haveany resources,we could not even buy a pencil we had nothing we had to work in eveningsin weekends, holidays and stuff like that, after nine months i said: no we cannot continueany longer , but then we had already 2000 scientific papers compiled on six hundredpages and it formed the bioinitiative report that was launched the last of august , 2007and it is called a rationale for biologically-based public exposure standards for electromagneticfields (elf and rf) , 600 pages you cannot publish in any journal, there are no journalthat would accept that , so this was initially

published on the internet, but later on partsof it has been formally published in a journal of pathophysiology 2009 , they took my ownchapter from here. six hundred pages , now we are talking dostoyevsky , if you have readthis russian author and now we are talking thick things ,you know ,hard texts , i didnot think anyone would ever read it , but see the european parliament read it and september4 , 2008 they concluded that the limits on exposure to electromagnetic fields which havebeen set for the public are obsolete and they need to be changed because they cannot protectthe general public , you know, i was flabbergasted , jesus, theyhave read it , they have understood all the details and they are acting upon it and ifelt now we are really in business and i waited

at my telephone that the european union parliamentwill call me , you know , but they did not, because the industry stepped forward and said: this is very true ,this is right, we need to reinvestigate this exposure guidelinesbut these fellows (fuckers) forming the bioinitiative working group they cannot do it , but we theindustry will do it, as so they did and they arrived at the conclusion that nothing hasto be changed: surprised , surprised , so that was the final outcome. very quickly ,iremember when the bioinitiative report was launched august 31, 2007 , the day after icame to my job , september the first , 2007 there were already three new papers in mycomputer that day that should have been in this, so therefore the bioinitiative reporthas been updated 2012 and 2014 and now is

in the worth of 5,000 references and approximately2,000 pages, so it is thicker and thicker and among such papers are effects on malesperm cells , they do not like to be exposed to the mobile phones and so on the same goesfor female egg cells, by the way ,you have very dramatic effects on fertility and theirreversible in fertility if we translate that to matarã³ it can be than young men andwomen in about 150 or 200 years time cannot get babies at all , because of something youdid 2015; it is a little too late to call back and say : hey , please could you stopthat exposure, because it has transgenic epigenetic effects that was shown itself in 5 generations,so think , here it is an effect on fetuses aswell as newlyborn babies,

they get stressed , their heart rate goesup and each heart beat is more shallow and when i ask parents, i guess a few of you areparents here, if they want to have stressed newlyborns or fetuses , no one says: oh, yes,that is exactly what i asked as a father or mother want to , everyone no, no, but whatis happening when you expose them to mobile telephony , very important study, tomato plantsin france they do not like to be exposed to base station exposure from the antennas andthey react with the sequence of damage molecules and i quote the french scientist who said: it is exactly as if we would crush them with a hammer , but they did not touch them,they have just exposed them to the base station radiation you are sitting in now and , therefore,when i walk around in your beautiful park

i feel ashamed . do we really know what theseplants are going through right now, maybe we do not , you know , retarded learning studiedin rats ,including both decrease in concentration capacity and increasing in short-term memory,it has been replicated in human beings ,here are young males that did less good in thelanguage linguistic tests in school when they were double-blindly exposed to mobile telephonyradiation so all these tablets and mobile phones and computers from that point of viewdamns you down, i do not know for spain but in sweden it is very obvious, you know swedenis the most computerized school country in the world pupils often have like 3 ,4, 5 computersof different types and they use them constantly and in the recent so-called pisa test (programmefor international student assessment ) the

swedish pupils haveplummeted in their learning capabilities ,like mathematical understanding, language understandingand also oddly enough in it (information technology ) knowledge and computer handling ,swedishkids are getting dumber and dumber as well ,maybe , it is not the same here , but insweden it is very clear-cut effect , so you can really question the pedagogic value aswell as the radiation effects here, and these studies ,by the way , they are elegant, verysmart and particularly this one again the big ,big ,big professor henry lai from universityof washington in seattle , united states , he did this already in 1994 where he looked atrats , so very smart , well, i am coming to the end , and in november, 2009, we felt thatthe bioinitiative report was a little bit

thick ,you know,600 pages and later on 2000pages that is a lot ,so we decided that we should sit down again and we met in norway, in seletun, outside bergen and we concluded that low intensity non-thermal bioeffectsand adverse health effects are demonstrated at levels significantly below existing standards,the official public safety limits here in spain use this one are inadequate and obsoletewith respect to prolong the low intensity exposures ,this is the one i talked about,one call in your life at most six minutes never, ever again and you need to be a fluid-filledplastic doll as well, so this is what spain uses it and new biologically based publicexposure standards are urgently needed to protect public health worldwide and it isnot in the public interest to wait , that

was 2010 and then what happened after thatwell, in 2011 ,may 6th the council of europe said based upon this seletun report and theseletun report by the way it is just 8 / 9 pages, so it is very short , so if you wantto read just one paper i would recommend that one and they said that you should ban mobilephones and wireless networks in schools, all together ,and that was exactly what we havesuggested too, may 31, 2011 the world health organization and their cancer organ whichis called the international association for research on cancer classifies radiofrequencyelectromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic , and remember that when they do that and2001 they did the same for household electricity power frequency magnetic fields and childhoodleukemia they could have put it in class 4

if they thought it was save ,because theyhave a class 4 for proven non carcinogenic exposures and substances but they did notand i believe strongly it is because they can be, they can be questioned legally youknow they are at the united nations organ and they could be put in front of the eu ifthey do something wrong and then it is better to say well it is possibly carcinogenic leavingthe responsibility to you, you have to decide it, it is up to you and if you get damagedor lose your health , get a cancer tumor or your children get a tumor whatever ,well,that is your problem ,we told you , it could be , so they have really protect their backs,2012 , october 12, the italian supreme court the highest legal in italy rules that a mobilephone caused cancer in a patient, it cannot

be over ruled , so it stands there, that isthe decision, i do not know in italy how much economic compensation people get, in sweden,you know , they get a few thousand euros at most ,not much at all , you know, but ,ofcourse ,behind this you have the united states and when we met at the lawyers office we talkedabout the claims that they have at the united states already they are aiming for one hundredbillion usd $ per case , 100 billion usd dollars per case , so the american state already beingbankrupt ,they need to take care here ,you know, because if a lawyer would win ,jesuschrist, that would be a precedent that would really echo throughout the world , so thatis what they are doing, january 29, 2015 france adopts a law aboutwireless systems in schools, france ,actually,

is very tough on this and also in france and,you know, in france is not easy to be disabled, it is very tough actually and they do notdo very much for people with various functional impairments , but this year 2015 ,a lady whoi have helped with three and a half years she got the legal and economic compensationfrom the french authority because of her electro hypersensitivity , so she gets a monthly allowancedue to this , quite unique in the world, i would say, so things are changing and nowit is october, 2015 catalonia maybe the answer, sorry, maybe the answer is to my questionbefore ,no more full-scale experimentations ,maybe we need to have a moratorium , stop and say let us do something, let us investigatemore and with all the publications i would

not do much more science actually,i wouldrather look for developing what i call tomorrows human friendly techniques and methodologies, so we do not harm each other and hopefully you will do it and hopefully in the futureall mobile phones and tablets and so on will be spanish or catalonia so you will developa new technique here. finally, do not ever believe that mobile phones and wireless internetand so on are safe, they are not , they interfere with normal brain function , learning andmemory, fertility, cancer risk, damage shown at dna in cells all of this can be found itin peer- review base scientific journals, but until now has not been in the public domain,so i leave really with you to think and think again think a third time and come up withtomorrows green human friendly technology

and to save the world actually , but beforedoing that i just would end to talk quickly about safety how should you arrive at thishuman friendly technology ,how should you think and you then remember that you herein spain you have this recommendation for exposure , it is 9.000.000/uw per m2 (squaredmeter) and other official bodies , other reports like the bioinititive report, theseletun statement , private persons, more bioinitiative report and so on ,they havesuggested that the public exposure should be stepwise lowered , it is still here forspain, this is the recommendation and to the best of my knowledge there is only one hygienicsafety level ever proposed and that is from 1997 and this is the natural backgroundand if you take these figures and divided

by this then you will get one quintilliontimes difference , so this is the natural background during which all of life on theplanet has been developed but since a few years back bam ,we put onantennas , base stations and so on and suddenly we expose people ,dogs, cats plants, bacteria,whatever insects at astronomically, biblical levels and the question is of course how couldthat ever be safe, when i presented this at the trade union office in stockholm in 1997in that room one of my toughest opponents was present the man and he said the following:normally i never trust olle johansson but this time he is completely right,so even he said 1997 this is the only way to achieve safety , but you are supposed tobe saved up here . thank you so much for attending.

applauses.